Australasian Existential Society

Past Reflections

 

The Freedom to Choose

24th February 2007

By

Estelle Phillips

Nietzche believed that freedom will give people the power to live life in a more exciting and challenging way, but it was Heidegger who used the term Dasein, being-in-the-world. Existential phenomenology focuses on Dasein emphasising the immediate experience and on the Noesis (the How) and the Noema (the what) of the experience.

The presenters, Dr Alison Strasser, Carlos Webster and Trudy Adelstein differed in manner and content, however all reflected and focussed on Dasein, the Noesis and the Noema.

We are who we are because of where we come from, but do we have to continue being who we are or do we have the Freedom to Choose? It is in the understanding of Dasein and the how and the what of our experiences that (hopefully) brings awareness that we are indeed Free to Choose.

Carlos spoke of a client’s world, his experiences and their shared discovery of how these experiences created the client’s belief system. The therapeutic work has been in staying with the how and the what of his client’s experience. The questioning whether the “original others” and “the outside world” validated or not? Or how and what was the experience of the word, the touch and the look all played and continue to play a part in who we/our clients believe we/they are. How we/they are:

  • Self to Self
  • Self to other
  • The experience of self in being-in-relation-with-the-other

This is how we all create our very own unique way of Dasein because of the Noesis and this Noema of our experiences.

Alison shared her client’s unique experience of being-in-the-world. Fearing she’d become like her mother, stuck and unhappy, she searched for freedom and happiness. Her fear led her to be stuck and unhappy! On discussion (with us) it became apparent that trying to understand and stay with the how and the what of the experience (stuck and unhappy) rather than fleeing would allow (hopefully) the shift her client wanted. Alison pointed out how change and freedom of choice creates anxiety. On reflection the pain of being stuck and unhappy is known to this client, being free and happy, (no matter how she yearned for it), is unknown. The Noesis and the Noema of being free and happy could be explored too.

As a mother with daughters, I sat listening to Trudy describing her client’s trauma of a murdered daughter, aware that I didn’t want to hear the client’s pain. She didn’t want to be in-the-world she wanted to be out-of-the-world as was her daughter. Trudy explained that we tend to revert to the age of the original trauma. Apparently this mother was struggling to cope with previous traumas now compounded with the recent most horrific one. Trying to understand the how and the what of her experiences felt unbearable. On reflection I wonder if staying with the how and the what of being-out-of-this world rather than on being-in-the-world would help?

I'm sure that there are many thought and reflections we could perhaps explore at either another forum or through this web page?

 


Copyright © 2010 Australasian Existentialist Society